Talk:Diego del Lobo/@comment-94.121.35.98-20170106145509/@comment-27574307-20170616165758

Is it only in my opinion that the actions (even less honest) done by this guy are not so naughty and disagreeable to make him a bad subject? He's not Jack the Ripper! It does not seem to me that he has committed homicides, massacres, or that he has turned himself into a person of a wicked mind. In fact, he seems to me to be an interesting character, with a moral code and a conception of legality a bit 'personal' but all in all, not a wicked sort of a middleway between Arsenio Lupin and an esthete of late '800, sometimes even nice. At least, for what we have seen so far, it does not seem to me a villain.I understand the criticism about the predictability of the plot (now we know this will not happen), bad boy / good girl who would overwhelmly Marina / Jonah, but it seems to me too scandalizing. We think of characters such as Jonah (an ex hitman, one who killed people on commission), Asal (she killed Nick Kringle), Michelle (she was working for sombra, a criminal organization), chief Ripley, Elliot or Hannah (hackers), even though they are pretty liked characters: we can see how Diego, compared to them, look like a miserable amateur. I find that Diego Not to be equally comparable to Jonah (he did not kill anyone, and if you allow someone to kill and steal four shingles, they are not actions of comparable gravity). At first I was surprised by Marina / Jonah, why should I be scandalized for a simple thief?Then, if there is one thing that the plot of CC teaches is that everyone can potentially be redeemed from their past (Michelle, Jonah ...), so see a character, not even bad in itself, branded as a villain irreducible and kept wide, leaves me at least puzzled.