Board Thread:Criminal Case Wiki news/@comment-25064703-20190120173428/@comment-27826967-20190121194504

BloodyNightWolf wrote: I AM the writers room wrote: K7U4i2X wrote: Detective Sotos wrote: K7U4i2X wrote: not 16, maybe at least 14 ? there are a lot of 10-year-olds and I know exactly who they are  Will that really make a difference? I mean, everyone can put a random age and sign up and still cause trouble. 🤨 a lot of these 10-year-olds claim to be at least 12-13, maybe that can change a thing ? With some of them being banned Boosting the minimum age limit would be a little more sufficient, 14 and 15 is still slightly immature so that's why I said 16 at least. You can tell how old they are sometimes. Even if they get banned they can still see the profiles and stuff written on here but they won't be able to comment using the banned account. Shall we not base ourselves on "maturity with age"? I know 13 years old more mature than peoples from my age! (I'm 16). Maturity isn't always based off the age. It is also based on the atmosphere, the place they lives in and many others factors. So raising the age limit seems quite unfair for those mature youths. I agree, being a 15 year old myself and been on the wiki for almost 3 years next month (Yeah I was 4 months too young but I am very mature, although VERY clumsy), age doesn't tell people your maturity (same with intelligence, some are below average whilst others are above and I have no problem being at one point either)