Board Thread:News on Criminal Case/@comment-25993708-20170131162939/@comment-24032096-20170131234647

Grumpyfish97 wrote: MaxShadows wrote: Grumpyfish97 wrote: Okay i'm done posting it seems some of you guys are blind if you clearly think the victim is Seamus. I'm going to have a field day with yall when the victim isn't obviously Seamus so....

While you have all the rights to believe the victim is not Seamus, others have the same rights to believe he is. That attitude you show by calling us "blind", "dumb", etc., and playing sarcastic is offensive and does nothing but forcing your opinion down others' throats. Discussions are won with arguments, not with those comments. Besides, I kept saying that my arguments formed a theory.

I understand your arguments, though, and we have nothing against you. Let me know if I am forcing my opinion down your throat in some ocassion. But things like these may lead to discipline if kept further.

MaxShadows |  Talk  ♦  Blog  ♦  Contributions  22:27, January 31, 2017 (UTC) Okay I'm very sorry if what I said was rude to you. It's just sometimes I go way too hard on the conversations to prove that I'm right. I'll now delete that post immediately. Well, but keep in mind than throwing a wild guess on the victim and/or giving your opinion is perfectly fine. If you do not sound rude, every argument of "he is not Seamus" or whatever will be accepted. Who knows, after all he might not be Seamus.