Board Thread:Wiki Discussion/@comment-16828707-20170215011159/@comment-177.53.0.18-20170215094151

KianisKoolFx wrote: 177.53.0.18 wrote: With all due respect, but are people now disappointed that they do not match their predictions? The cool in stories are surprises as long as they make sense. And the history of Elysium Field made perfect sense, just review the cases, everything was well thought out and fit. I'm sure even with more time, Pretty Simple would not change it.

If people do not want stories with surprises, but they want something totally predictable, let them play in looping the Industrial Area and the Financial Center, or go play CSI: Hidden Crimes, which has no surprises I wasn't saying make it predictable; because thats how it feels right now for me. I think that once a certain character shows up in the case, I am most likely right with the prediction I set it with. But I don't want my predictions to be right. I want a suprise. I am saying the exact thing you think im not saying, just in different context. It may be that you are not, but you simply enter the page of the case, and most of the complaints are: "Why did they put two new characters instead of Lady Highmore and Diego del Lobo, as everyone had in their prediction?"

Now are the characters forced to go back when people want it, and not when the developers think that is correct? And is this a disappointment? That was the predictable story for everyone, but Pretty Simple surprised us and gave us a different story that made sense. It may be that some really did not like the story, but many did not like it because it did not return the characters they wanted, what seems to me nonsense. This is my point.